2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 595 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (203 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Clio. (93 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 3 | Clio |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1149 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 76.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 50 L |