2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2006 Volkswagen Transporter
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Volkswagen Transporter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Volkswagen Transporter would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (154 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2006 Volkswagen Transporter. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2006 Volkswagen Transporter.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volkswagen Transporter (250 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (203 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Volkswagen Transporter will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 2006 Volkswagen Transporter | |
Make | Mazda | Volkswagen |
Model | 3 | Transporter |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1894 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |