2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Nissan Livina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Nissan Livina would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Livina weights approximately 1280 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Livina (154 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (135 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan Livina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 3 | Livina |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 135 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 2405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.4 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 52 L |