2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, both 2009 Mazda 3 and 2009 Mazda 6 were released in the same year (2009). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. Both 2009 Mazda 3 and 2009 Mazda 6 are equipped with a 1,999 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (147 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (146 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 230 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (135 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | 3 | 6 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1999 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 147 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 186 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.4 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 64 L |