2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford C-Max (150 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 179 kg more than 2010 Ford C-Max.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford C-Max (240 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 3 | C-Max |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1596 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1554 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1626 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2648 mm |