2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (269 HP) has 124 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 333 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Kia Cadenza has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Kia Cadenza will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 3 | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
| Make | Mazda | Kia |
| Model | 3 | Cadenza |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3000 cc |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 269 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4965 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1475 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2845 mm |
