2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2010 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2010 Nissan Rogue is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Rogue (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 62 kg more than 2010 Nissan Rogue.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (203 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 2010 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 3 | Rogue |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2500 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1488 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4646 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1659 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |