2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2010 Nissan Rogue

To start off, 2010 Nissan Rogue is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Rogue (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 62 kg more than 2010 Nissan Rogue.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (203 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mazda 3 2010 Nissan Rogue
Make Mazda Nissan
Model 3 Rogue
Year Released 2009 2010
Body Type Hatchback Crossover
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2260 cc 2500 cc
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 154 HP 170 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 203 Nm 237 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 4400 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual CVT
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1550 kg 1488 kg
Vehicle Length 4550 mm 4646 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1801 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1659 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2690 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 60 L