2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2010 Peugeot 4007
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 4007 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Peugeot 4007 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 4007 (154 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 4007 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3.
Because 2010 Peugeot 4007 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 4007 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 4007 (380 Nm) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 Nm). This means 2010 Peugeot 4007 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 2010 Peugeot 4007 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | 3 | 4007 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |