2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2011 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2011 Holden Caprice is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Caprice (344 HP) has 190 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (154 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3.
Because 2011 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Caprice (530 Nm) has 327 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (203 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3. 2011 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 2011 Holden Caprice | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | 3 | Caprice |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 6000 cc |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 344 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 530 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 12.3 L/100km |