2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2012 Holden Calais

To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 236 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3.

Because 2012 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (240 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3. 2012 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: