2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2012 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda CR-V (148 HP) has 44 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 Nm). This means 2012 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3. 2012 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 2012 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Mazda | Honda |
Model | 3 | CR-V |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2199 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4554 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1819 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 58 L |