2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2012 Opel Ampera
To start off, 2012 Opel Ampera is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda 3 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Opel Ampera weights approximately 473 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 3 | 2012 Opel Ampera | |
| Make | Mazda | Opel |
| Model | 3 | Ampera |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 1715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4498 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1438 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2685 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 35 L |
