2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2012 Peugeot 408
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 408 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot 408 (147 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 408 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Peugeot 408 (200 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2012 Peugeot 408 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3. 2012 Peugeot 408 has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Peugeot 408 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 2012 Peugeot 408 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | 3 | 408 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1997 cc |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 147 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1815 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1525 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2710 mm |