2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2013 Volkswagen Eos

To start off, 2013 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Volkswagen Eos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volkswagen Eos (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volkswagen Eos weights approximately 467 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volkswagen Eos (281 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Volkswagen Eos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3. 2013 Volkswagen Eos has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Volkswagen Eos will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mazda 3 2013 Volkswagen Eos
Make Mazda Volkswagen
Model 3 Eos
Year Released 2009 2013
Body Type Sedan Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1598 cc 2000 cc
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 104 HP 197 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5100 RPM
Torque 145 Nm 281 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 1700 RPM
Engine Bore Size 78 mm 82 mm
Engine Stroke Size 83.6 mm 92 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.6:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1128 kg 1595 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4410 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1791 mm
Vehicle Height 1700 mm 1443 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2578 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 55 L