2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2013 Volvo S80

To start off, 2013 Volvo S80 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo S80 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (156 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo S80 weights approximately 575 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo S80 (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (203 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mazda 3 2013 Volvo S80
Make Mazda Volvo
Model 3 S80
Year Released 2009 2013
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2260 cc 3200 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 6 valves
Horse Power 156 HP 237 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 203 Nm 320 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 3200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual CVT
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1125 kg 1700 kg
Vehicle Length 4520 mm 4851 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1861 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1493 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2835 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 8.1 L/100km 6.9 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 10.7 L/100km 10.4 L/100km