2009 Mazda 5 vs. 1947 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,481 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1947 Talbot T 26 (168 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 5. (153 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1947 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 5.
Because 1947 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda 5 has automatic transmission and 1947 Talbot T 26 has manual transmission. 1947 Talbot T 26 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda 5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 5 | 1947 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | Mazda | Talbot |
| Model | 5 | T 26 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1947 |
| Engine Size | 2258 cc | 4481 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3130 mm |
