2009 Mazda 5 vs. 1954 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,693 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 5 (144 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1954 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1954 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Talbot Baby weights approximately 234 kg more than 2009 Mazda 5.
Because 1954 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 5 | 1954 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Mazda | Talbot |
| Model | 5 | Baby |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2693 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 144 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3130 mm |
