2009 Mazda 5 vs. 1968 Plymouth GTX
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Plymouth GTX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Plymouth GTX would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Plymouth GTX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Plymouth GTX (375 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 5. (144 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Plymouth GTX should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Plymouth GTX weights approximately 181 kg more than 2009 Mazda 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Plymouth GTX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Plymouth GTX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Plymouth GTX (651 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 466 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 5. (185 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1968 Plymouth GTX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 5. 1968 Plymouth GTX has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 5 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1968 Plymouth GTX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 5 | 1968 Plymouth GTX | |
| Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
| Model | 5 | GTX |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 7206 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 144 HP | 375 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 185 Nm | 651 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 109.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 95.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.1:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 1597 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2950 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 72 L |
