2009 Mazda 5 vs. 1970 Volvo 140
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 5 (153 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1970 Volvo 140. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1970 Volvo 140.
Because 1970 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 5 (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Volvo 140. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 5 | 1970 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 5 | 140 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 201 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2610 mm |