2009 Mazda 5 vs. 1974 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 5 (113 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1974 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1974 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 5 weights approximately 155 kg more than 1974 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 5 (165 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 5 | 1974 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Mazda | Triumph |
| Model | 5 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 113 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |
