2009 Mazda 5 vs. 1979 Opel Ascona
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 5 weights approximately 462 kg more than 1979 Opel Ascona.
Because 1979 Opel Ascona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Opel Ascona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 5 | 1979 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | 5 | Ascona |
Year Released | 2009 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 144 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 954 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2530 mm |