2009 Mazda 5 vs. 1989 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 3,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Rover Range Rover (185 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 5. (153 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 5.
Because 1989 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Rover Range Rover (319 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1989 Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 5 | 1989 Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Mazda | Rover |
| Model | 5 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1989 |
| Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2258 cc | 3947 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 185 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Torque | 201 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 82 L |
