2009 Mazda 5 vs. 1994 Xedos 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Xedos 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Xedos 6 would be higher. At 2,258 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 5 (153 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1994 Xedos 6. (106 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1994 Xedos 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 5 (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Xedos 6. (138 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Xedos 6. 2009 Mazda 5 has automatic transmission and 1994 Xedos 6 has manual transmission. 1994 Xedos 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda 5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 5 | 1994 Xedos 6 | |
Make | Mazda | Xedos |
Model | 5 | 6 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2258 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 201 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2620 mm |