2009 Mazda 5 vs. 1996 Volvo 460
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volvo 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volvo 460 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 5 (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1996 Volvo 460. (82 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1996 Volvo 460.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 5 (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Volvo 460. (125 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Volvo 460.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 5 | 1996 Volvo 460 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 5 | 460 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 201 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 83.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 60 L |