2009 Mazda 5 vs. 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda 5 has automatic transmission and 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder has manual transmission. 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda 5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 5 | 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder | |
| Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
| Model | 5 | Pronto Spyder |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2258 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 46 L |
