2009 Mazda 5 vs. 1999 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,530 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mercury Cougar (168 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 5. (113 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 5 weights approximately 56 kg more than 1999 Mercury Cougar.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mercury Cougar (223 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 5. (165 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 5.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mazda 5 1999 Mercury Cougar
Make Mazda Mercury
Model 5 Cougar
Year Released 2009 1999
Body Type Minivan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1798 cc 2530 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 113 HP 168 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 165 Nm 223 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 82.4 mm
Engine Stroke Size 83.1 mm 79.5 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1400 kg 1344 kg
Vehicle Length 4510 mm 4710 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1620 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2710 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 58 L