2009 Mazda 5 vs. 2004 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Renault Scenic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Renault Scenic would be higher. Both 2009 Mazda 5 and 2004 Renault Scenic are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 5 (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2004 Renault Scenic. (74 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Scenic weights approximately 90 kg more than 2009 Mazda 5.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 5 (310 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Scenic. (105 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 5 | 2004 Renault Scenic | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | 5 | Scenic |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1614 kg | 1704 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 48 L |
