2009 Mazda 5 vs. 2004 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 5 (151 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 5 weights approximately 385 kg more than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volkswagen Polo (195 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 5. (148 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2004 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 5.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mazda 5 2004 Volkswagen Polo
Make Mazda Volkswagen
Model 5 Polo
Year Released 2009 2004
Body Type Minivan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2260 cc 1422 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 151 HP 74 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 148 Nm 195 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 2200 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.7:1 19.5:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 6 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1550 kg 1165 kg
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1660 mm