2009 Mazda 5 vs. 2004 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo C70 (190 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 5. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 5 weights approximately 49 kg more than 2004 Volvo C70.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 5 (310 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volvo C70. (285 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 5 | 2004 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 5 | C70 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 285 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 16.7:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1614 kg | 1565 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |