2009 Mazda 5 vs. 2005 Volkswagen Multivan
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Volkswagen Multivan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Volkswagen Multivan would be higher. At 3,187 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Volkswagen Multivan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volkswagen Multivan (232 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 5. (153 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Multivan should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 5.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volkswagen Multivan (310 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2005 Volkswagen Multivan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 5 | 2005 Volkswagen Multivan | |
Make | Mazda | Volkswagen |
Model | 5 | Multivan |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Minivan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3187 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 201 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 11.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 12.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 80 L |