2009 Mazda 5 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Raider would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (211 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 5. (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 5.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (319 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 5 | 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | |
Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
Model | 5 | Raider |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3704 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 201 Nm | 319 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 83 L |