2009 Mazda 5 vs. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser

To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda 5 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 5. (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 5.

Because 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 5.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mazda 5 2012 Citroen C-Crosser
Make Mazda Citroen
Model 5 C-Crosser
Year Released 2009 2012
Body Type Minivan Crossover
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2260 cc 2359 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 154 HP 168 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 201 Nm 232 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 4100 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.5 mm 88 mm
Engine Stroke Size 94 mm 87 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 10.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 6 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors