2009 Mazda 5 vs. 2013 Ford EDGE

To start off, 2013 Ford EDGE is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda 5 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford EDGE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford EDGE (301 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 5. (153 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford EDGE should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 5.

Because 2013 Ford EDGE is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford EDGE will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford EDGE (380 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Ford EDGE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 5.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mazda 5 2013 Ford EDGE
Make Mazda Ford
Model 5 EDGE
Year Released 2009 2013
Body Type Minivan Crossover
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2258 cc 3700 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 153 HP 301 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 201 Nm 380 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 8.4:1 10.8:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front AWD
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 6 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4620 mm 4679 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 2223 mm
Vehicle Height 1640 mm 1702 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2824 mm
Fuel Consumption 8.7 L/100km 8.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 11.2 L/100km 12.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 72 L