2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1943 Packard 12
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 66 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Packard 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Packard 12 would be higher. At 7,756 cc (12 cylinders), 1943 Packard 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1943 Packard 12 (174 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1943 Packard 12 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1943 Packard 12 weights approximately 870 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1943 Packard 12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1943 Packard 12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 6 | 1943 Packard 12 | |
| Make | Mazda | Packard |
| Model | 6 | 12 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1943 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2486 cc | 7756 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 169 HP | 174 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 2420 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3440 mm |
