2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1944 Packard 12
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Packard 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Packard 12 would be higher. At 7,301 cc (12 cylinders), 1944 Packard 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1944 Packard 12 weights approximately 1095 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 1944 Packard 12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1944 Packard 12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 6 | 1944 Packard 12 | |
| Make | Mazda | Packard |
| Model | 6 | 12 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1944 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 7301 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 147 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1355 kg | 2450 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3440 mm |
