2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn would be higher. At 4,255 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn weights approximately 875 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn | |
Make | Mazda | Rolls-Royce |
Model | 6 | Silver Dawn |
Year Released | 2009 | 1951 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 4255 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 139 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5170 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 108 L |