2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1955 Triumph TR3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Triumph TR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Triumph TR3 would be higher. At 2,487 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1955 Triumph TR3. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1955 Triumph TR3.
Because 1955 Triumph TR3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Triumph TR3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (167 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Triumph TR3. (160 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Triumph TR3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 6 | 1955 Triumph TR3 | |
| Make | Mazda | Triumph |
| Model | 6 | TR3 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1955 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2487 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1420 mm |
