2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1958 Seat 600
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (104 HP) has 85 more horse power than 1958 Seat 600. (19 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1958 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 379 kg more than 1958 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (145 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Seat 600. (40 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 6 | 1958 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Mazda | Seat |
| Model | 6 | 600 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 19 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 40 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 576 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2010 mm |
