2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1958 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 2,486 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1958 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1958 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 590 kg more than 1958 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Wartburg 312. (82 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1958 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Mazda | Wartburg |
Model | 6 | 312 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2486 cc | 900 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 82 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 78 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2460 mm |