2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1960 Mini MK I
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (146 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1960 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1960 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 679 kg more than 1960 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1960 Mini MK I | |
Make | Mazda | Mini |
Model | 6 | MK I |
Year Released | 2009 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 848 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 60 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1294 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2040 mm |