2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1960 Mini MK I

To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mini MK I would be higher. At 2,488 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1960 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1960 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 510 kg more than 1960 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mini MK I. 2009 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1960 Mini MK I has manual transmission. 1960 Mini MK I will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: