2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 2,486 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4. (104 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 535 kg more than 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 6 | 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 | |
| Make | Mazda | Triumph |
| Model | 6 | Dove GTR4 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2486 cc | 2138 cc |
| Horse Power | 169 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 53 L |
