2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1962 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (161 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1962 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1962 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 745 kg more than 1962 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Mazda 6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Volkswagen 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1962 Volkswagen 1500 | |
Make | Mazda | Volkswagen |
Model | 6 | 1500 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1605 kg | 860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 40 L |