2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1963 Skoda 1202
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Skoda 1202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Skoda 1202 would be higher. At 2,487 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1963 Skoda 1202. (44 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Skoda 1202.
Because 1963 Skoda 1202 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Skoda 1202. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (167 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Skoda 1202. (85 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Skoda 1202.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1963 Skoda 1202 | |
Make | Mazda | Skoda |
Model | 6 | 1202 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2487 cc | 1221 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 85 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1710 mm |