2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1964 TVR Griffith
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 TVR Griffith. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 TVR Griffith would be higher. At 4,725 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 TVR Griffith is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1964 TVR Griffith.
Because 1964 TVR Griffith is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 TVR Griffith. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1964 TVR Griffith | |
Make | Mazda | TVR |
Model | 6 | Griffith |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 4725 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2170 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 67 L |