2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1964 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 3,725 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (272 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 1964 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1964 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 695 kg more than 1964 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1964 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Mazda | Zastava |
Model | 6 | 850 K |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Size | 3725 cc | 848 cc |
Horse Power | 272 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2010 mm |