2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1967 Seat 1500
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,487 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1967 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1967 Seat 1500.
Because 1967 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1967 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | 6 | 1500 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2487 cc | 1479 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1630 mm |