2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1972 Plymouth Road Runner
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Plymouth Road Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Plymouth Road Runner would be higher. At 5,563 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Plymouth Road Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Plymouth Road Runner weights approximately 475 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 1972 Plymouth Road Runner is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Plymouth Road Runner. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1972 Plymouth Road Runner has manual transmission. 1972 Plymouth Road Runner will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1972 Plymouth Road Runner | |
Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
Model | 6 | Road Runner |
Year Released | 2009 | 1972 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2488 cc | 5563 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1600 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2980 mm |