2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 993 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 6 | 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Mazda | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | 6 | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2488 cc | 6750 cc |
| Horse Power | 169 HP | 0 HP |
| Top Speed | 208 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 2118 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3060 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 107 L |
