2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1973 Renault 12
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Renault 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Renault 12 would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (104 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1973 Renault 12. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1973 Renault 12. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 55 kg more than 1973 Renault 12. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (145 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Renault 12. (94 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Renault 12.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1973 Renault 12 | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 6 | 12 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1288 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 94 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 143 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 56 L |